Content

EPILOGUE in:

Helmut Breidenstein

Mozart's Tempo-System, page 256 - 256

A Handbook for Practice and Theory

1. Edition 2019, ISBN print: 978-3-8288-4291-5, ISBN online: 978-3-8288-7203-5, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783828872035-256

Tectum, Baden-Baden

CC-BY-NC-ND

Bibliographic information
256 Mozart's Tempo-System EPILOGUE „The Mozart player must shoulder a burden of perfection that goes beyond his powers." (Alfred Brendel674). It is the same for the researcher, and the editors of the New Mozart Edition could teil us a thing or two about that. One cannot be grateful enough for their devoted work over decades; it was the basis of my own investigations. May they forgive me for feeling obliged to point to some unavoidable errors. Even after the unalterable printed edition it w ill be possible gradually to correct the errata and to add missing indications to the digitized edition that so commendably keeps every page of the scores and their Critical Reports simultaneously present online free of charge. Greater attention to time signatures and tempo words would do a great Service to the practice which in still too many cases must mistake indications by other hands for authentic. Likewise I must ask for leniency for my own mistakes. Among the 1,576 movements with an autograph „tempo" indication which I submit here sorted into 434 modules, there are surely not a few which I have classified wrongly; readers may have already marked them in red. The lists should nevertheless offer good possibilities for comparison. My starting point in a field very little worked on for 200 years had been the puzzle of the 2,727 movements or parts of movements which - whether so indicated or not have a new tempo. My file of data that collected all relevant information for each such place into more than 100,000 fields has proved to be a very useful tool. In five decades of research on this subject with constant testing of the results in my work as an opera and concert conductor with soloists, orchestras and choruses, and with new insights from the literature as well as a final check online o f all current Criti cal Reports in the NME in May 2009, I have changed some of my assessments concerning the frequency of certain tempo indications. Thus in this book their listing (anyway of minor importance) sometimes differs from that in my earlier essays. A team would be necessary to consolidate the work I have started, since it has certainly become evident that this can only be the beginning. 557 ,tempo' indications by foreign hands - anonymous or those of the editors of the NMA - await a researched comparison with the autograph material submitted here. In the huge field of literature about Mozart as well as in relevant specialist Conferences, with rare exceptions the subject of Mozart's tempi which is so extraordinarily important for the practice has been carefully avoided.— C o m p o u n d m e t r e s , , l a r g e ' 4 / 4 , , h e a v y ' 3 / 4 , r e c i t a t i v e m e t r e and v i r t u a l ch ang e s o f m e t r e have been left largely undiscussed. The extensive specialist literature about the m i n u e t has been content with the simplest, even wrong, answers to the question of its tempos. There is almost no research about the m a n n e r s o f p l a y i n g , so essential for the „(logically) correct" execution, in their relationship to the other parameters of the performance; the interpreter is still at the mercy of his or her own feeling, experiments and „in tu ition" influenced by an overwhelming plenitude of already existing interpretations. Manners of playing can of course in no way be systematized; it would certainly be interesting, however, to find out what style of performance for a composition Mozart had in mind when he chose so carefully (as described) among the thousands of possible modules of metre+class o fno te values+tempo word the most suitable for the indication. Knowledge of their characteristic features should be the precondition for finding in Mozart's tempo system the „righ t" mouvement in the broadest sense of the word for the actual score, the actual ensem ble and one's own temperament on this day, in this room, theatre, church or concert hall for this audience. „The unending study of cross-relations between all types of composition w ill eventually bear fru it in performances of authenticity, w ithout any dry rot or pedantic historism."676 S The author will answer possible questions with pleasure on his homepage, www.mozarttempi.de, in the impressum ofwhich his contact details can be found. 674 Alfred Brendel, „A Mozart Player Cives Himself Advice" (1985) in: „Music, Sense and Nonsense" (2015), p. 7. — There is no headword „Tempo" (much less a chapter) in the more than 500 pages of the Standard work „Performance Practice. Music after 7600" (Howard Mayer Brown and Stanley Sadie, London 1989). In the six-day Conference „Performing Mozart's Music" (New York, 1991) this most important matter for the performance was as little a topic as in the Mozart congresses of the other anniversary year, 2006. See, however, Performance Practices in Classic Piano Music (Sandra P. Rosenblum, Indiana, 1988), especially Interaction o f Metre, Note 'Values and Tempo Headings in Chapter 9: Choice o f Tempo. 676 Erich Leinsdorf, The Composer's Advocate, 1981, p. 126.

Chapter Preview

References

Abstract

A reference book for the musician’s practical work of interpretation, this volume, after a general presentation of 18th century principles for determining a tempo, offers a compendium of all Mozart’s autograph tempo markings in 420 lists of pieces of similar character. Thus, a comparison of slower and quicker movements is made possible by 434 music examples, and there follows a wide-ranging collection of relevant texts taken from historical sources.

The book does not claim to know “the single correct tempo” for the works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. It hopes to be of assistance in the unavoidable search by every interpreter for the “true mouvement” of each work—for the work itself, for the performer, the instrument or instruments, the room, the public, the nature of the event. It follows that there can be no absolutely “authentic” tempo for Mozart’s works. And yet his tempo markings, since he chose them so meticulously, should be taken equally seriously with the other parameters of his famously precise notation.

Alfred Brendel writes: “an astonishing opus … one of those rare and important books in which music and musicology form a vital association; a lifelong study that makes one very much aware of a field to which attention is rarely paid. It accomplishes this by bringing to bear an understanding that never loses sight of the musical foundation on which it is built, and by a discerning intelligence that does not shy away from raising debatable topics, although without ever claiming infallibility … One cannot be grateful enough to Helmut Breidenstein for his methodological accuracy which allows us Mozart interpreters to orientate ourselves with ease and pleasure … His book sharpens our perception, at the same time giving an overview and making us sensitive to each individual case. Admiration and gratitude.”